George Orwell's novel "1984" and why was LRH's mention of this book deleted from the famous PDC lectures?
A significant alteration has been made to the new PDC tapes:
LRH original PDC tape 20:
"Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced. Did you ever read poor old George Orwell's 1984? Yes,yes, that's wonderful. That would be--- could be the palest imagined shadow of what a world would be like under the rule of the secret use of Scientology with no remedy in existence."
L. Ron Hubbard Library altered version of PDC tape 20:
"Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced."
The rest is Deleted!!!
In order to understand why the mention of George Orwell's book "1984" was deleted I recently red the book again. I red it as a youngster, but wanted a fresh view on it. It was frightening. Apart from being an extremely well written suspense novel it is scaringly close to reality.
It would be an absolute must for any suppressive Management to delete it's founders mention of this book, as if the general member red it, it is too likely to open their eyes. I cannot recommend reading it strongly enough. It is simply a must. And once you have red it, you will know exactly why LRH's mention of it has been deleted. Read it!!!
One point in "1984" is that the second dynamic is completely suppressed by the rulers (The Party). Sex is ONLY a mean of making children and soon the activity would be replaced by artificial insemination.
It would seem like the Church Management is working along the same line in the Sea Organization. See here how they have altered the definition of the second dynamic:
SECOND DYNAMIC is CREATIVITY. Creativity is making things for the future and the second dynamic includes any creativity. The second dynamic contains the family unit and the rearing of children, as well as anything that can be categorized as a family unit. It also incidentally includes sex as a mechanism to compel future survival.
That is the definition you will find in the new versions of Scientology books, not in the original LRH books. It is clearly not LRH as it is completely out of alignment with the rest of the dynamics. Creativity is something else, it applies for all the dynamics. It definitely does not fit in as its own dynamic.
Clearly "survival through self family group mankind" makes sense.
Now look at "survival through self creativity group mankind" that does not, never will fit in.
That makes, writing a song, building a house or starting a company a second dynamic activity! Well, that definitely does not make sense. And if you take the quote from HCO PL 11. August 1967 SECOND DYNAMIC RULES "We are also aware that those org staff which are overactive on the second dynamic seldom prosper" it becomes even more evident that the new definition of the second dynamic could not be LRH. Because, how can a person be overactive on creation and creating things for the future?? And how could creativity possibly make him seldom prosper??
There is definitely suppression on the second dynamic. As a Sea Org staff member you are not allowed to have children. Should a staff member anyway decide to get a baby they will be send out of the Sea Org until the children are at least 10 years old. The Sea Org certainly don't approve of children. See this link how abortions are not only encouraged, but also arranged for pregnant Sea Org members: http://www.spaink.net/cos/mpoulter/worst/abortion.html
Here is another section of the LRH original PDC tape 20:
"It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't horde it, don't hold it; and if you ever do use any Black Dianetics, use it on the guy who pulled Scientology out of sight and made it so it wasn't available. Because he's the boy who would be electing himself "The New Order." And we don't need any more new orders. All those orders, as far as I am concerned, have been filled."
L. Ron Hubbard library altered version of PDC tape 20:
"It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't hoard it and don't hold it."
The rest is Deleted!!!
Obviously there is a reason for RTC to delete this statement as well. Somebody at the very top, who did in fact elect himself as the new order, is getting paranoid. What an outrageous statement! Yes maybe, but can you come up with a better explanation for deleting the above statement??
As another comparison to "1984" I can inform you that AOSH EU is completely wired up and has hidden camera's all over. From the security room you can monitor almost every spot of the org, probably except the toilets. Just like the tele-screens of "1984". But why would they need all this surveillance? Why mock up such a "1984" scenario? It surely ain't cheap. Management wants total and complete control, just like the inner party from "1984".
The main character in "1984", Winston Smith, works at the ministry of truth. His job is to change the past so that the history is always in favor of the ruling party. This includes changing newspaper articles, books and all kinds of official records. Rewriting it so that it will always prove Big Brother (head of the party) right and his opponents wrong. Also changing pictures or removing individuals from pictures is a part of his job. In the end nobody will know the history of the past except from their own memory. This activity is also practiced by the Church of Scientology. I have experienced this myself. My face was removed from two pictures in the Impact magazine in year 2000. Edited out. I was photographed on stage with my Honor Roll Member plaque and in the lobby with other IAS Honor Roll and Patrons. When the magazine came out I was edited out of the pictures. Thus changing the past and omitting the fact that Robert Dam had become an Honor Roll member that evening. The reason was that RTC refused to declare me back in Good Standing. See the letter from Impact Editor Brian Fraser here
It would seem that the "1984" practice of editing pictures is something that Church has done more than once. See these examples: http://www.lermanet.com/PhotoLIES.htm
Another example of changing the past:
This picture is from the original booklet "How big was the old Saint Hill".
Below picture is from a later edition. Clearly four people from the original was not wanted to have been present. Three was removed and one got hair! Some might have been SP declared, some may have turned against the Church. Buttom line is that history is manipulated. If you only see the later edition you won't see what actually took place, who was actually there. Thus changing the past, exactly per the book "1984".
"Big Brother is watching you" is one of the most famous sentences from "1984" and almost everybody knows it. It is even the title of one the many reality shows running on TV these days.
"Big Brother" was a front figure for the party. Huge pictures of him was posted all over the city. If he was still alive or ever existed was not really certain. Of course the party would claim that he was still alive and still the leader, but no one ever saw him.
He was made into a complete hero. A super powerful leader, a caring person (you older brother) who had no faults what so ever. In him you could depend completely. Establishing such a powerful figure was vital in the name of keeping full control of the population. He would not let you "go astray", so to say. He would always keep an eye on you to help you if you turned in the wrong direction. You would never be able to, never want to, escape his attention and control.
It is pretty much the same principle being dramatized in the Church of Scientology. All over the place are pictures of LRH. He is being made into a war hero, a proffessional photographer and musician, a master mariner and so forth. Well, he definitely was an outstanding person, but he was also just a man. But, the Church Management is painting a picture of a super hero, a Big Brother.
Check also this link: http://www.freezone.de/english/news/tech-changes/pdc.htm
Here is a link for George Orwell alias Eric Blair: http://www.k-1.com/Orwell/